首页> 外文OA文献 >Improving management of gout in primary care using a customised electronic records template
【2h】

Improving management of gout in primary care using a customised electronic records template

机译:使用定制的电子记录模板改善初级保健痛风的管理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is known that the management of chronic gout in relation to serum uric acid (SUA) monitoring, allopurinol dosing, and lifestyle advice is often sub-optimal in primary care.[1] A quality improvement project in the form of a criterion based audit was carried out in an urban general practice to improve the care of patients being treated for gout.\ud\udBaseline searching of EMIS confirmed that management of patients with gout who were taking allopurinol was not in line with current guidance. 51(40%) had a SUA checked in the past 12 months, 88(25%) had a SUA below target level, and gout lifestyle advice was not being recorded.\ud\udAn audit was performed to measure and improve the following criteria:\ud\ud• Monitoring of SUA levels in the past 12 months\ud\ud• Titration of urate lowering therapy to bring the SUA below target level\ud\ud• Lifestyle advice in the past 12 months\ud\udAn audit standard of 60% achievement at 2 months and 80% achievement at 4 months was set.\ud\udThe intervention consisted of a custom electronic template within EMIS which allowed guidance of gout management to be displayed and for data to be entered. All members of the team including GPs and administrative staff were educated regarding the intervention. This resulted in a sustained improvement over a 6 month period in all 3 components of the audit with 112(84%) having a SUA level checked, 79(51%) having a SUA below target level and 76(57%) receiving lifestyle advice. Although the improvement did not reach the audit standard in 2 of the criteria it would be expected that outcomes would continue given the systems changes which have been made.
机译:众所周知,在初级保健中,与血清尿酸(SUA)监测,别嘌呤剂量和生活方式建议相关的慢性痛风的管理通常不是最佳选择。[1] \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\“ \” \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\-\\\\\\\\\\-\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\的基线检查的形式,是一个基于标准审计的质量改进项目。与当前指导不符。在过去的12个月中,有51%(40%)的SUA得到了检查,有88%(25%)的SUA低于目标水平,并且没有记录痛风的生活方式建议。 :\ ud \ ud•过去12个月的SUA水平监测\ ud \ ud•滴定尿酸降低疗法以使SUA低于目标水平\ ud \ ud•过去12个月的生活方式建议\ ud \ ud设置了分别在2个月时60%的成就和4个月80%的成就。\ ud \ ud干预措施由EMIS内的自定义电子模板组成,该模板可显示痛风管理指南并输入数据。团队的所有成员,包括全科医生和行政人员,都受到了有关干预措施的教育。这使得审计的所有三个组成部分在六个月内都得到了持续改善,检查的SUA水平为112(84%),SUA低于目标水平的为79(51%),接受生活方式建议的为76(57%) 。尽管改进没有达到其中两个标准中的审核标准,但可以预期,鉴于系统已进行的更改,结果将继续下去。

著录项

  • 作者

    Moffat, K.; McNab, D.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号